Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Demansia. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Demansia reticulata 539606
Update your content

Taxonomic Split 127673 (Submetido em 16-04-2024)

Nankivell et al. 2023 found some populations referred to D. r. cupreiceps Storr are not distinguishable from more typical D. reticulata but the widespread central Australian population (treated by most authors as part of cupreiceps) was shown to be specifically distinct. They describe the species, naming it D. cyanochasma.

desconhecido
Adicionado(s) por rfoster em 30 de junho de 2023, 04:51 AM | Committed by loarie on 16 de abril de 2024
dividido em

Comentários

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5311.3.1

Publicado por rfoster 10 meses antes

Demansia reticulata cupreiceps still a valid ssp according to Reptile Database, can you contact them? They did just add Demansia cyanochasma though

Publicado por loarie 7 meses antes

I've spoken to Peter (@uetz) and he will amend the Demansia reticulata entry in the Reptile Database.

Publicado por rfoster 7 meses antes

@uetz Peter, is there any progress on amending the Demansia reticulata entry in The Reptile Database to sink the subspecies, in line with Nankivell et al., 2023?

Publicado por rfoster 6 meses antes

@loarie I have altered this from a split of Demansia reticulata cupreiceps to a split of Demansia reticulata in order to carve off the D. cyanochasma observations without having to deal with the subspecies glitch in TRD. This is now ready to go - most D. cyanochasma observations have been reidentified manually, anyway, but committing the split will tie up a few loose ends.

Publicado por rfoster 6 meses antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments
Membro da Rede iNaturalist   |   Desenvolvido por software de código aberto do iNaturalist |   Documentação para programadores