Themes for 2018? Taking Suggestions Now!

Dear San Mateo County Bio-Blitz users:

What a year 2017 has been so far for San Mateo county and this project - we've grown along every vector from participation to species observed. The remarkable @dpom continues to outpace us all, while setting a standard for knowledge expansion. So I ask our users now - where does the data base need work? Particular taxa? Places where more and better coverage is needed? Species of special concern to document wherever we encounter them? Let's get interactive with each other and come up with ideas! Thanks for everything you contribute to the project, and keep growing!

Jennifer Rycenga @gyrrlfalcon

Posted on 17 de dezembro de 2017, 03:57 PM by gyrrlfalcon gyrrlfalcon

Comentários

Does San Mateo not have beavers? I noticed that you don't have observations. Maybe you can do a "missing species" theme? Fill in some gaps in the list.

Publicado por vermfly mais de 6 anos antes

That's a good idea! I think we've got the birds and butterflies pretty well taken care of, but mammals...

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon mais de 6 anos antes

Missing any herps? I don't know the full potential of San Mateo.

Publicado por vermfly mais de 6 anos antes

Did you know that the San Mateo County Birding Guide includes San Mateo lists for Butterflies, Odes, Mammals, and Herps? We DO IT ALL at Sequoia Audubon!! http://birding.sequoia-audubon.org/checklistHerps.html

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon mais de 6 anos antes

Are all those confirmed with records in iNat? Is there anything else that is theoretically there but not recorded? That would be interesting to know.

Publicado por vermfly mais de 6 anos antes

I'd have to run a check to see if they've all been recorded. We have some good herpers in the vicinity.

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon mais de 6 anos antes

Well, I was able to check for the Salamanders - we have all but the California Tiger Salamander there.

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon mais de 6 anos antes

That's a very interesting species that is missing. I wonder if it is still in the county or if it has been extirpated.

Publicado por vermfly mais de 6 anos antes

Could you ID the areas that need observations and make a list of those? I’m sure some are on private property. Could we ask for permission?

Publicado por metsa cerca de 6 anos antes

interesting idea @metsa

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon cerca de 6 anos antes

BTW, knowing of @vermfly 's concern to "GET THE FISH" - we do have somewhat better fish coverage than many parts of iNaturalist - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?captive=any&place_id=any&project_id=799&subview=table&taxon_id=47178&verifiable=any&view=species
However, there's likely more that needs doing!

Publicado por gyrrlfalcon cerca de 6 anos antes

@gyrrlfalcon That is pretty good. I imagine there are still quite a few possible things you could get. Especially offshore. I don't see a single shark or skate on that list.

Publicado por vermfly cerca de 6 anos antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments