Update your content

Taxonomic Swap 69999 (Submetido em 03-09-2021)

Wallin et al. 2013: "No differences in the male or female genitalia characters of M. sartor and M. urussovi (Fischer von Waldheim, 1805) were found. We thus regard M. urussovi as a subspecies of M. sartor: M. sartor urussovi nov. stat. (cf. ICZN 1999). Sláma (2006) had a similar view, since he also considered M. urussovi to be a subspecies of M. sartor, although he used the invalid name M. rosenmuelleri (Cederhjelm, 1798) for M. urussovi (cf. Löbl & Smetana, 2010). Cesari et al. (2005) found no significant difference in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene between M. sartor and M. urussovi supporting the present results in that the two species are closely related". Systematic position of Monochamus sartor urussovi was repeated by Plewa et al. 2018.

Monochamus sutor sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) = rosenmuelleri Cederhjelm, 1798: 89 (Wallin et al., 2013).

desconhecido
Adicionado(s) por jacek_kurzawa em 25 de janeiro de 2020, 02:03 PM | Committed by vitalfranz on 03 de setembro de 2021
replaced with

Comentários

Agreed, I have not seen the type yet but M. rosenmuelleri seems to be a synonym of M. sutor, and was commented as this by Plavilstshikov (1958) who may have seen the type. M. s. rosenmuelleri has been recently used (and for iNat purposes) as the name for M. s. urussovii. See further comments from 2018 here: http://www.cerambycidae.net/news/06.08.2018/06.08.2018_europa_rem.html The original name was Cerambyx Urussovii, since urussovi has not been in prevailing usage it is an unjustified emendation and not an available name (see ICZN Article 33). I will explain why I believe it is a good species in the context of Monochamus in an upcoming paper.

Publicado por bycidman cerca de 4 anos antes

So when will this swap happen?

Publicado por marina_gorbunova quase 4 anos antes

I do not agree.
Considering Cederhjelm's orignal descriptions (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44241#page/120/mode/1up) L. heinrothi was compared to L. sutor and. L. rosenmuelleri was compared to L. sartor.
It appears strange that Cederhjelm described twice the same species.
In fact, several differences corresponding to two species can be noted: elytra spotted (heinrothi) or uniform (rosenmuelleri), body size smaller (heinrothi) or larger (rosenmuelleri), elytra with ocellate (heinrothi) or strong (rosenmuelleri) punctures, legs grey pubescent (heinrothi) or black uniform (rosenmuelleri).
Accordingly, the provided pictures (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44241#page/383/mode/1up) show two different species.
In addition, several other characters typical of these two species can be noted:
L rosenmuelleri looks grayish, with strong humeri and tapered elytra, while heinrothi is black with parallel-sided elytra.
In conclusion, the synonymy sutor = rosenmuelleri is not supported.

Publicado por vitalfranz quase 4 anos antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments
Membro da Rede iNaturalist   |   Desenvolvido por software de código aberto do iNaturalist |   Documentação para programadores