Both genera Lycocerus and Abiphis were proposed as replacement names for the preoccupied genus Iphis. So, the type species for both those names have to be the same as for the old Iphis. Later on, the species formerly included in Iphis were treated as three separate genera by Fleutiaux 1942, but the names Lycoreus and Abiphis were re-used for the two split-off genera, changing their sense and type species. This wasn't according to the ICZN rules, of course. Hence the "new genera" proposed in that catalogue.
Lycoreus is now monotypic and contains only L. glaucus, which used to be Lacais glauca and is from South America.
desconhecido
Adicionado(s) por borisb em 18 de janeiro de 2021, 05:26 PM
|
Committed by borisb on 18 de janeiro de 2021
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.