Taxonomic Merge 46343 (Submetido em 09-05-2019)

POWO citation. Note that POWO's Leptosiphon aureus is attributed to E. Vilm. and is now correctly listed as a synonym of Leptosiphon parviflorus. The iNaturalist observations identified as Leptosiphon aureus and Linanthus aureus refer to Linanthus aureus (Nutt.) J.M. Porter & L.A. Johnson, and must take a different name when placed in Leptosiphon. Details begin on p. 57 here.

Plants of the World Online (Citação)
Adicionado(s) por stevejones em 19 de janeiro de 2019, 05:43 PM | Committed by jdmore on 09 de maio de 2019
fundido com

Comentários

Publicado por stevejones cerca de 5 anos antes

@jaykeller, if you agree - and moreso if you don't - with the ID's I and @polemoniaceae posted here let us know. Otherwise your ID will end up as Leptosiphon chrysanthus if and when this taxon change is committed.

Publicado por stevejones cerca de 5 anos antes

The last link in your message does not work for me, i get the message 'Sorry, that doesn't exist!'.

On catalogueoflife it is Leptosiphon chrysanthus ssp. chrysanthus (syn: Leptosiphon aureus, Linanthus aureus). I agree that the plants identified as Linanthus aureus and as Leptosiphon aureus represent the same species that is described as Leptosiphon chrysanthus. L. parviflorus is quite different and it is nearly impossible to confuse it with L. chrysanthus.

I am ok with this taxon merge, but lets wait for more answers.

Publicado por kai_schablewski cerca de 5 anos antes

For some reason, the link is preceded with: https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_merges/" and ends with a close-quote. Odd, that. Here's the actual link: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=aliso
There is another subspecies, Leptosiphon aureus ssp, decorus, and there are observations under that name. The "Move children to output" option should result in Leptosiphon chrysanthus ssp. decorus being added as well.

Publicado por stevejones cerca de 5 anos antes

Ah, thank you!

I know that article, i have read it some days ago already when i made many taxonchanges in Polemoniaceae.
I dont know why i missed this taxonchange, i think i was reading this before i created the genus Dayia on iNaturalist.

Publicado por kai_schablewski cerca de 5 anos antes

Yes, I saw your recent taxon changes - it's why I included you. The discussion originated here. Thanks for the comments and I agree - let's wait for more responses before committing.

Publicado por stevejones cerca de 5 anos antes

@polemoniaceae @bouteloua @dhwilken @jrebman @grnleaf @kai_schablewski @jdjohnson

All, I have edited this swap to NOT move children to output. This is because [Leptosiphon aureus subsp. aureus + Linanthus aureus subsp. aureus] ==> Leptosiphon chrysanthus subsp. chrysanthus will not work that way. So I have created a separate merge (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/56270) to cover that portion of the change. So there are three draft merges that should be committed in this sequence:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_merges/46703
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_merges/56270
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_merges/46343 (this one)

That said, I think it's time to do a final check for any confused or out of range IDs, then get these merges committed before the flood of this year's new observations really hits for these taxa. (I will double-check some range-edge observations on the map right now...)

Any concerns remaining about going forward with this?

Publicado por jdmore quase 5 anos antes

I abstain. Please move on without me. :)

Publicado por bouteloua quase 5 anos antes

Only found this one so far: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/23418562

Anyone care to chime in on the ID?

Publicado por jdmore quase 5 anos antes

@stevejones @kai_schablewski Any objections if I go ahead and commit the above three merges?

Publicado por jdmore quase 5 anos antes

No objection, Jim, and sorry for not responding earlier.

Publicado por stevejones quase 5 anos antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments