Journal archives for March 2020

March 20, 2020

Computer Vision Artifical Knowledge Links

Waarneming.nl: Max 3 keer per jaar herziening van het model.
Model 1.Naturalis: 2-20 photos per species
Model 2.Naturalis: 40 photos per species

Model 2-4.1Nat:40 photographers per species
Model 5.1Nat:1000 photos per species
eferentiewaarnemingen er gebruikt worden (5000 of 40)

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/inaturalist/K9nJOC0Cjss

https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help#cv-taxa
https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help#computer-vision
https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help#cv-select
https://www.inaturalist.org/blog/31806-a-new-vision-model
FWIW, there's also discussion and some additional charts at
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/psst-new-vision-model-released/10854/11
https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/identification_quality_experiment
https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/loarie/10016-identification-quality-experiment-update
https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/loarie/9260-identification-quality-experiment-update
about a rare species, but the system might still recommend one based on nearby observation
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/identification-quality-on-inaturalist/7507
https://github.com/kueda/inaturalist-identification-quality-experiment/blob/master/identification-quality-experiment.ipynb
"nearby" means near in space and time
The model became more efficient in sedges and grasse
the vision model does not itself incorporate non-image data other than taxon IDs
b/c because
https://www.inaturalist.org/blog/25510-vision-model-updates ("taxon and region comparisons" 20190614)
https://distill.pub/2020/circuits/zoom-in/ ("connections between neurons")
https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/flora-of-russia/journal/31726
https://www.inaturalist.org/posts/31726-
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/provide-relevant-geographic-data-confidence-level-accuracy-scores-with-ai-suggestions/9226/2
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/range-covered-by-the-seen-nearby-feature/2849/5

====
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/use-computer-vision-to-annotate-observations/3331

https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/what-image-s-are-used-for-training-computer-vision/3307/6

Interessant artikel over de Artificial Intelligence achter Inaturalist: https://news.mongabay.com/wildtech/2017/08/smartphone-app-combines-computer-vision-and-crowdsourcing-to-explore-earths-biodiversity-one-photo-at-a-time/

= = = Nov2020
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/better-use-of-location-in-computer-vision-suggestions/915/32
https://github.com/inaturalist/iNaturalistAPI/blob/main/lib/controllers/v1/computervision_controller.js#L368

Common ancestor for the top 3 raw results

https://github.com/inaturalist/iNaturalistAPI/blob/main/lib/controllers/v1/computervision_controller.js#L368

https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/ahospers/28858-funding-infrastructure-costs-images-on-amazon

m looking for a way of finding observations without coordinates. Many of these have Location Notes, so it is basically lacking Longitude or Latitude that I am looking for.
I am not interested in those with Latitude = 0 or Longitude = 0 (see https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/null (which is very inappropriately named, as I am looking for NULLS but this project identifies zeros instead - nulls have no data (value unassigned, or empty, or missing), but 0 is a specific datum - zero - like any other value - and not a “null”)).
At present for this user, filtering on verifiable=false gives me more or less what I want, but conflates these with any Data Quality criteria, not just missing coordinates.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=any&subview=grid&user_id=ahospers&verifiable=false 1

I added a very basic search to atlases in response to Jane’s feature request https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases 6. So now if you wanted to see all ‘marked’, ‘active’ atlases of taxa in the LIliaceae you’d do https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases?utf8=✓&filters[taxon_name]=Lilies&filters[taxon_id]=47328&filters[is_active]=True&filters[is_marked]=True

The out-of-range is vestigal, we don’t display it anywhere anymore (except the old filter menu thats still on https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/loarie 1). It worked directly on the taxon-range, rather than using atlases

Posted on March 20, 2020 15:31 by ahospers ahospers | 4 comments | Leave a comment